SAM 3D (fal) model ALL KINGDOMS

Image→3D reconstruction

941.1 BT in Image→3D reconstruction #4 in method 158 votes 15 tasks firm

Ratings by task

Task	Category	Outputs	Votes
Amanita muscaria — single-image → 3D reconstruction	Fungi	1	1
Anas platyrhynchos — single-image → 3D reconstruction	Animals	1	9
Boletus edulis — single-image → 3D reconstruction	Fungi	1	1
Canis lupus familiaris — single-image → 3D reconstruction	Animals	1	9
Carassius auratus — single-image → 3D reconstruction	Animals	1	12
Danaus plexippus — single-image → 3D reconstruction	Animals	1	10
Glycine max — single-image → 3D reconstruction	Plants	1	20
Hericium erinaceus — single-image → 3D reconstruction	Fungi	1	11
Lycoperdon perlatum — single-image → 3D reconstruction	Fungi	1	1
Morchella esculenta — single-image → 3D reconstruction	Fungi	1	10
Pinus sylvestris — single-image → 3D reconstruction	Plants	1	20
Rosa — single-image → 3D reconstruction	Plants	1	21
Solanum lycopersicum — single-image → 3D reconstruction	Plants	1	9
Trametes versicolor — single-image → 3D reconstruction	Fungi	1	10
Zea mays — single-image → 3D reconstruction	Plants	1	13

Head-to-head

within its own method · Image→3D reconstruction

Opponent	W–L–T	n	Win rate
Meshy 6	7–34–1	42	17.9%
Pixal3D	9–11–1	21	45.2%
Hunyuan3D v3	5–9–4	18	38.9%
TRELLIS via Replicate	7–5–0	12	58.3%
Rodin/Hyper3D	3–5–1	9	38.9%
TRELLIS 2	4–2–1	7	64.3%
Hunyuan3D 3.1	3–3–0	6	50.0%
TRELLIS via fal	4–1–0	5	80.0%
TripoSR	3–2–0	5	60.0%
Hunyuan3D v2	0–4–0	4	0.0%

Records cover all judged comparisons, ties included: a tie counts as half a win and one comparison, so n is the true number of times the two models were judged against each other. “Both bad” votes are excluded.

Sample outputs

SAM 3D (fal) recon